From: Rui Miguel Seabra (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Jul 28 2002 - 08:44:48 EDT
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 06:47:49PM -0400, Dom Lachowicz wrote:
> I think that October 1st is extremely ambitious (read stupid) for a *stable* release date. Things we need to get together (just from our current codebase):
> I'm not saying that we should wait 2 years to release. I'm very much in favor of a 1.1.1 build released around October with hopefully all of my "A" action items followed by several more 1.1.x releases.
> We'd follow that up with a short 1.3 series which handled most of my "B" items, and then get to 2.0.
I understood that what has been proposed is a first beta version, with
beta stability, and not 2.0 stabilty :)
I agree with your plan, and I'd add a 1.9.x series for the run for full
stability like we did on the final road to 1.0
Actually, the rpms I have built once in a while to follow the
development have been name 1.0.99-date in order to allow for a hopefull
1.1.x release and keep rpm happy about upgrades :)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Jul 28 2002 - 07:50:12 EDT