Re: proposed updateBacgroundColor() fix

From: j.m.maurer (
Date: Mon Jul 29 2002 - 10:52:16 EDT

  • Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: proposed updateBacgroundColor() fix"

    AFAICT, this is just a hack and doesn't fixes the real problem I
    addressed is my mail from a few minutes ago.


    Op ma 29-07-2002, om 16:41 schreef Tomas Frydrych:
    > At the heart of the problem is the fact that our colour classes cannot
    > represent transparent colour. My suggestion is that we change the
    > m_red, m_grn, m_blu members of UT_RGBColor and related from
    > unsigned char to signed short and use -1,-1,-1 as a representation
    > of transparent color. This will do away with the need to re-examine
    > the bgcolor property in fp_Run::updateBackgroundColor().
    > Any objections? If not, I will do this.
    > Tomas

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 10:58:04 EDT