From: j.m.maurer (j.m.maurer@student.utwente.nl)
Date: Mon Jul 29 2002 - 11:13:25 EDT
Op ma 29-07-2002, om 17:07 schreef Joaquin Cuenca Abela:
>
> --- "j.m.maurer" <j.m.maurer@student.utwente.nl>
> wrote:
> > AFAICT, this is just a hack and doesn't fixes the
> > real problem I
> > addressed is my mail from a few minutes ago.
>
> btw, IMO your problem is a completely orthogonal one
> to the transparent stuff.
True, I see that now
> Just to put some background on this problem (to
> everybody that has not followed all that closely
> enough), when a run has a "transparent" (or white)
> background,
(But now you are getting to my problem again....)
No, a run isn't supposed to have a background or transparent color, it's
container may have on, but a Run not
> and somebody asks the run to clear itself,
> the run asks the page what is its background,
The clear call should be forwarded to it's parent container. The run
should not be allowed to do this
and then
> we do a lookup which ends showing in the performance
> stats (basically because we ask each run to clear
> itself a *lot* of times).
>
This will indeed help a for now. Although this should be rewritten
sometimes
Marc
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jul 29 2002 - 11:30:18 EDT