From: Tomas Frydrych (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jul 30 2002 - 04:17:33 EDT
> I've not yet look at your commit, but I was not
> suggesting to add a bool to UT_RGBColor, but to
It would not work, the transparency is attribute of the colour, not of
the run, and it has to be able to propagate down from the containers.
> Basically, I wanted to keep UT_RGBColor a... RGB
> color. As I said, we don't handle transparency all
> over our code, so there is no need to change
Anythings that lookups bgcolor property can be transparent ...
> 1) Gtk+ 2: As you may know, gtk+ 2 depends on Xft...
just for the record, I am currently not able to work under Linux (have
not been for a while).
> 2) Performance was *poor*. Very poor. It was taking
> a bit more to open my doc (~3 minutes) than when we
> first started with this performance course. I don't
> know why it was so slow, but in the stats I had yet
> one more time ::find_slot with >20 000 000 calls.
> The "only" differences between my last build and this
> one are:
> 1) gtk+ 2 (I'm not suspecting this change)
> 2) non Xft (neither this one, but who knows...)
> 3) recent, non gtk+2 changes (?)
> 4) my own local changed diffed from my old tree and
> patched to the new one (?)
I have done my profiling on win32, and at the last run pretty much all
of the top functions in terms of time were those interfacing to system
graphics calls -- font setting, width measuring, etc. So I would not be
surprised if the gtk2 has something to do with it.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 30 2002 - 04:26:26 EDT