Re: IMPORTANT: proposed removal of non-bidi code

From: Christian Biesinger (cbiesinger@web.de)
Date: Tue May 07 2002 - 12:26:16 EDT

  • Next message: Paul Rohr: "Re: IMPORTANT: proposed removal of non-bidi code"

    Paul Rohr wrote:
    > 1. native, non-bidi ... the well-tested code that everyone uses now
    > 2. bidi ... some testing, not enough use
    > 3. Pango-based ... to be written and/or ported as needed
    [...]
    > I also am willing to believe that we'll get to the point where #3 is good
    > enough that we should *also* replace #1. However, I'm stunned to hear that
    > we're already at this point.

    As I understand it, #2 will replace #1; not #3. 

    -- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                                                  -- Benjamin Franklin

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 07 2002 - 14:29:47 EDT