Re: IMPORTANT: proposed removal of non-bidi code

From: Christian Biesinger (cbiesinger@web.de)
Date: Wed May 08 2002 - 09:06:43 EDT

Next message: Scott Rushfeldt: "Re: Final Itteration."

Previous message: Scott Rushfeldt: "Re: IMPORTANT: proposed removal of non-bidi code"
In reply to: Scott Rushfeldt: "Re: IMPORTANT: proposed removal of non-bidi code"
Next in thread: Tomas Frydrych: "Re: IMPORTANT: proposed removal of non-bidi code"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Scott Rushfeldt wrote:
> Isn't the pango code going in the bidi build under debug or define
> code so that it doesn't affect the the rest of the code unless turned
> on?

Yes, at least what's currently on is in #ifdef WITH_PANGO (enablable
with ABI_OPT_PANGO=1 iirc)

-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
                                                  -- Benjamin Franklin

Next message: Scott Rushfeldt: "Re: Final Itteration."
Previous message: Scott Rushfeldt: "Re: IMPORTANT: proposed removal of non-bidi code"
In reply to: Scott Rushfeldt: "Re: IMPORTANT: proposed removal of non-bidi code"
Next in thread: Tomas Frydrych: "Re: IMPORTANT: proposed removal of non-bidi code"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed May 08 2002 - 11:10:04 EDT