From: Andrew Dunbar (hippietrail@yahoo.com)
Date: Sat Jul 06 2002 - 22:57:49 EDT
--- Alan Horkan <horkana@tcd.ie> wrote: >
> Is there not a more generic way to import unknown
> tags?
Actually I don't know but these are not unknown tags.
As a first implementation we can treat them as "do
nothing" tags. Later on we'll do the right thing
with them.
> And while you are looking at this part of the code i
> was wondering if
> abiword allows/preserves tags of the form <? blah ?>
> or if <!-- comments
> survive intact -->
> i have been meaning to test this out for myself but
> got distracted...
That's a good question and my bet is that we don't
preserve such things. Whether we ought to is open
for debate.
Andrew Dunbar.
> Sincerely
> Alan Horkan
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 08:27:59 +0100 (BST)
> From: "[iso-8859-1] Andrew Dunbar"
> <hippietrail@yahoo.com>
> To: AbiWord <abiword-dev@abisource.com>
> Subject: Re: Commit (HEAD): Fix HTML plugin
>
> --- "j.m.maurer" <j.m.maurer@student.utwente.nl>
> wrote: > Fix typo that broke the build
>
> Sorry about that. I have CVS but no compiler.
> I'm trying to do some work on Bug 3662.
> I've added new tags <ruby>, <rt>, and <rp>.
> For now we need to treat them just as <span> and
> accept all text inside them without doing anything
> special.
> We're currently ignoring anything inside them which
> results in dataloss in documents that use ruby.
>
> <snip>
>
=====
http://linguaphile.sourceforge.net http://www.abisource.com
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jul 06 2002 - 23:02:00 EDT